TY - GEN
T1 - Metodología para la conservación de puentes que permitan avanzar hacia estructuras resilientes
AU - Ortiz, Giannina
AU - Rojas, Gustavo
AU - Paez, Gerardo
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 IABSE Congress San Jose 2024: Beyond Structural Engineering in a Changing World - Report. All rights reserved.
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - Road infrastructure performance is of paramount importance in terms of competitiveness indices for any country, with bridges usually being one of the most vulnerable elements within the infrastructure network. In asset management cycles, bridge assessment methodologies have typically been limited to a damage exposure. Investment in bridge-infrastructure normally depends on public investments, which usually address immediate damages but rarely emphasize in their causes. Therefore, interventions seldom linger over time. On the other hand, the generation/selection of pre-defined indicators as a tool for decision making allow policymakers to execute actions based on facts. Consequently, the proposed methodology considers the calculation of a BHI (health index) that considers the vulnerability of the structure (BCI) and the threats (SCI, HCI) that allow an analysis of the environment (hydrometeorological and seismic conditions), as well as a prioritization considering socioeconomic importance. The use of these indicators derives into an initial recommendation of preservation activities. Nonetheless, whenever an indicator falls into unacceptable or deficient classes, a root-cause analysis is required to identify the causes of the identified pathologies, which ultimately establishes interventions that allow for a reduction in the vulnerability of the pathologies. Finally, a comprehensive assessment and the application of mitigation measures, will translate into more resilient structure.
AB - Road infrastructure performance is of paramount importance in terms of competitiveness indices for any country, with bridges usually being one of the most vulnerable elements within the infrastructure network. In asset management cycles, bridge assessment methodologies have typically been limited to a damage exposure. Investment in bridge-infrastructure normally depends on public investments, which usually address immediate damages but rarely emphasize in their causes. Therefore, interventions seldom linger over time. On the other hand, the generation/selection of pre-defined indicators as a tool for decision making allow policymakers to execute actions based on facts. Consequently, the proposed methodology considers the calculation of a BHI (health index) that considers the vulnerability of the structure (BCI) and the threats (SCI, HCI) that allow an analysis of the environment (hydrometeorological and seismic conditions), as well as a prioritization considering socioeconomic importance. The use of these indicators derives into an initial recommendation of preservation activities. Nonetheless, whenever an indicator falls into unacceptable or deficient classes, a root-cause analysis is required to identify the causes of the identified pathologies, which ultimately establishes interventions that allow for a reduction in the vulnerability of the pathologies. Finally, a comprehensive assessment and the application of mitigation measures, will translate into more resilient structure.
KW - bridge evaluation
KW - bridge index
KW - resilience
KW - risk assessment
KW - vulnerability
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85210880805&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Contribución a la conferencia
AN - SCOPUS:85210880805
T3 - IABSE Congress San Jose 2024: Beyond Structural Engineering in a Changing World - Report
SP - 259
EP - 267
BT - IABSE Congress San Jose 2024
PB - International Association for Bridge and Structural Engineering (IABSE)
T2 - IABSE Congress San Jose 2024: Beyond Structural Engineering in a Changing World
Y2 - 25 September 2024 through 27 September 2024
ER -